Man sues Verizon for $72 million, says negligence allowed him to commit ID theft

Stupid is as stupid does…

Man sues Verizon for $72 million, says negligence allowed him to commit ID theft

A Florida inmate has sued Verizon Wireless for $72 million because he feels the company's negligence allowed him to steal another man's identity.

On 29 December 2016, James Leslie Kelly filed a lawsuit with the United States District Court in Tampa against Verizon. In it, he accuses the wireless telecommunications company of having caused him "substantial harm and damages as well as, pain and suffering, the diminished capacity to enjoy life and, emotional duress... [sic]."

Kelly's apparent grudge against Verizon dates back to 7 May 2015. On that day, Kelly entered a Verizon Wireless store in Highlands County, Florida. Kelly says he submitted a valid driver's license to a Verizon specialist, who pulled up a Verizon account belonging to another James Kelly who had a different middle name. The specialist apparently failed to spot the difference.

The Florida man spent an hour and a half in the Verizon shop that day, reports WFTV. During that period of time, he abused the other James Kelly's account to purchase $300 worth of products.

Kelly feels it is Verizon's negligence that allowed him to steal the other man's identity, which in turn led to his arrest and a 10-year prison sentence.

As he alleges in his handwritten complaint:

"[The] Verizon employee... failed to take a course of action that a reasonably minded person would normally do when encountering the obvious discrepancy that is alleged."

Verizon complaint

Should the Verizon specialist have spotted the error? Yes, but everyone is allowed to make a mistake.

If Kelly had been an upstanding gent, he would have notified the specialist of the error. By no means should the Florida man, who has a criminal record dating back to 1985, have capitalized on the mistake to commit identity theft. He's accusing Verizon when he's the only person to blame here.

Fortunately, not every dog has its day. The Register writes that the Tampa court is already moving to throw the case out. Kelly can then spend the rest of his prison sentence thinking about how he needs to take responsibility for his own actions on the other side of the fence.

Tags: ,

Smashing Security podcast
Check out "Smashing Security", the new weekly audio podcast, with Graham Cluley, Carole Theriault, and special guests from the world of information security.

"Three people having fun in an industry often focused on bad news" • "It's brilliant!" • "The Top Gear of computer security"

Latest episode:

,

5 Responses

  1. Elliot Alderson

    January 5, 2017 at 5:43 pm #

    oh comon, it's florida after all. what did you expect.

    stay krazy my friend, and stay in florida.

    haha!

    ZfG

    whaddaijiot

    • blah in reply to Elliot Alderson.

      January 6, 2017 at 8:15 pm #

      What do you have against FL? I live in FL… there's stupid people everywhere, including your state.

  2. blah

    January 6, 2017 at 8:13 pm #

    "Kelly's apparent grudge against Verizon dates back to 7 May 2015. On that day, Kelly entered a Verizon Wireless store in Highlands County, Florida. Kelly says he submitted a valid driver's license to a Verizon specialist, who pulled up a Verizon account belonging to another James Kelly who had a different middle name. The specialist apparently failed to spot the difference.

    The Florida man spent an hour and a half in the Verizon shop that day, reports WFTV. During that period of time, he abused the other James Kelly's account to purchase $300 worth of products."

    IF this is true… I'd say he actually has a case if it happened like this. Especially if he didn't even know the mistake until later… like when he was arrested.

    • David Bisson in reply to blah.

      January 6, 2017 at 8:43 pm #

      That's a good point. In all likelihood, the Verizon employee probably asked Kelly if he was the individual associated with the account after inspecting his driver's license. Given Kelly's extensive criminal record, I'm not so sure he's the type of guy who would correct a mistake like that. But there is a chance he never saw the information. If that's true, I agree he'd have a case.

  3. Michael Ponzani

    January 7, 2017 at 12:04 am #

    I agree with Mr. Cluely. Aeon for 1-6-17 has an article abput morality. Aristotle vs Kant. This is worth a read.

Leave a Reply