Heartbleed bug explained by xkcd in a way anyone can understand

It's simply amazing how amazingly simple this xkcd cartoon is at explaining what the Heartbleed bug is all about.

Heartbleed explained

Source: xkcd, "How the Heartbleed bug works"

Further reading:

Tags: , ,

Subscribe to the free GCHQ newsletter

, ,

Leave a reply

3 Comments on "Heartbleed bug explained by xkcd in a way anyone can understand"

Notify of

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
April 11, 2014 1:14 pm

Hi Graham!
Should we change all internet passwords?? :(

April 11, 2014 6:01 pm

NO! That is inherently bad advice from misguided people/organisations. There's serious flaws in that suggestion. Instead, read the following:

1. Is the server in question vulnerable (as in, was it vulnerable) ? If not, then likely no need to change. However, see below. Also note specifically that you might have to change here too if by chance you are affected by 4, below.
2. Is it vulnerable still? If it is then not only will you risk your old password (when you log in to change it) you risk your new password being leaked (not to mention any other number of things). Note that if they have not generated a new security certificate then they may as well still be vulnerable!
3. If however it is fixed then by all means change the password (would be unwise to not if the server was vulnerable). Also if you have the hardware (eg mobile phone with text) and the site offers two factor authentication, you might want to consider that too.
4. Further, if by some chance (ahem) you used the same password then not only will you need to confirm that the sites you also used them on are not vulnerable, you will also have to change those too. And when you do that don't use the same password! This also means if you used a password on an unaffected site that is used on another site (affected or not) you should change it, because what if one is compromised by another flaw? In general: don’t use the same password twice.
5. The media is very bad in general about security suggestions because they use sensationalism which adds to confusion, misleading the public and causing more problems. Even sites that were vulnerable were suggesting you change all passwords. Don't buy in to that! It is naive at best and beyond dangerous at worst!

April 11, 2014 4:20 pm

SSL = Stupid Slovenly Losers….. Give a monkey a keyboard….. wait for it………. SSL